Letitia James Lawyered Up with Hunter Biden’s Protection Lawyer After Trump Official Drops Bombshell Allegations of Mortgage Fraud — Admits to “Mistakenly” Claiming Virginia Dwelling as Major Residence | The Gateway Pundit


Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

New York Lawyer Common Letitia James has employed Democrat protection legal professional Abbe Lowell in a last-ditch effort to spin away critical fraud allegations tied to her actual property dealings.

Lowell, a accomplice at Winston & Strawn LLP, is named a high-profile legal professional for embattled political figures, having represented Democrats akin to Hunter Biden, John Edwards, and even Invoice Clinton throughout his impeachment trial.

In keeping with the Occasions Union, he was reportedly employed by the Workplace of the New York State Lawyer Common, not personally by Letitia James, simply days after Trump-appointed officers filed a formal legal referral to the DOJ.

The referral, spearheaded by U.S. Federal Housing Director William Pulte, accuses James of collaborating in suspicious actual property and mortgage transactions stretching again a long time.

The Gateway Pundit and the White Collar Fraud beforehand reported again in early March that James has been implicated in a number of situations of mortgage fraud, with essentially the most damning claims centered on her Brooklyn and Virginia properties.

  1. Falsifying Residency in Virginia: In 2023, James co-signed a mortgage for a Norfolk, Virginia property, allegedly misrepresenting it as her “principal residence” in an influence of legal professional doc. (Learn extra: Revealed: NY Lawyer Common Letitia James Declares Virginia Dwelling Her ‘Principal Residence’)

  2. Brooklyn Property Misrepresentation: James’ Brooklyn house, bought in 2001, is listed in a 24-year-old certificates of occupancy as a five-unit dwelling, but she has persistently claimed it as a four-unit property for mortgage and tax functions. (Learn extra: Large Improvement: Is Letitia James Responsible of Mortgage Fraud?)

  3. Queens Property Fraud: A 1983 mortgage software for a Queens property, crammed out by James’ late father, Robert James, falsely listed Letitia James as his partner slightly than his daughter. (Learn extra: Mortgage Fraud Alert: Did Letitia James Marry Her Father?)

In a six-page letter despatched to Lawyer Common Pam Bondi, James’ legal professional, Abbe David Lowell, scrambled to deflect the accusations.

Lowell’s response, dripping with indignation, accuses President Trump of orchestrating “political retribution” and labels Pulte’s referral as “baseless” and “hypocritical.”

The letter leans closely on cherry-picked reveals, akin to emails and property data, to argue that any discrepancies have been sincere errors or misinterpretations.

Lowell: “Director Pulte’s letter, itself “[b]ased on media reviews,” raises three points: one reference out of a whole file of paperwork to a property in Virginia being Ms. James’ “principal residence”; one 24-year-old doc amongst a pile of others defining a Brooklyn property as having 5 dwellings when a mortgage in query referred to as for under 4; and two decades-old references (one 42 years outdated and the opposite 24 years outdated) to paperwork crammed out by Ms. James’ deceased father the place he both checked a incorrect field or misstated his relationship with Ms. James to be spousal slightly than parental.”

As an example, Lowell claims James explicitly informed her mortgage dealer the Virginia property was not her major residence, pointing to an August 3, 2023, e-mail trade.

Lowell: “Director Pulte cherry-picked an August 17, 2023 energy of legal professional that mistakenly acknowledged the property to be Ms. James’ principal residence and on the identical time completely ignored her very clear and all caps assertion two weeks earlier to the mortgage mortgage dealer that “[t]his property WILL NOT be my major residence[.] Will probably be Shamice’s major residence.” The dealer understood this, and that Ms. James was not a Virginia resident, and replied, “Part 4 signifies that the property will probably be occupied as a major residence for Shamice. . . . Your declaration is marked as a non-occupying co-borrower.”

On the Brooklyn subject, he cites a 2011 Dwelling Inexpensive Modification Program software and NYC Division of Finance data to say the property has all the time been a four-unit residence.

Lowell: Director Pulte factors to a 24-year-old certificates of occupancy itemizing the property as having 5 items, regardless of that the property has functioned as a four-unit residence for the previous 24 years since Ms. James purchased it.

The truth is, a doc he’s properly conscious of, the August 23, 2011 Dwelling Inexpensive Modification Program software, confirms it as being a four-unit property.

Worse but, Director Pulte ignores altogether the opposite New York Metropolis data that record the Brooklyn property as a four-unit property, together with the NYC Division of Finance property document itemizing the Brooklyn property’s Constructing Class as “C3 – 4 Households” for tax functions (e.g., 4 residential items).

  As well as, the NYC Division of Housing Preservation and Improvement (HPD) lists the Brooklyn property as having “4” “A Items” and “0” “B Items”— demonstrating, once more, that Ms. James’ Brooklyn residence has been used as a four-unit residence since 2001.

Merely put, cherry-picking a 24-year-old certificates of occupancy and ignoring the various occasions the Metropolis’s data say the other is what occurs when a so-called “legal referral” is “[b]ased on media reviews.”

As for the Queens property, Lowell insists Robert James’ error was insignificant, supported by a same-day deed accurately figuring out Letitia as his daughter.

Lowell: In 1983, Ms. James’ father, Robert James sought to purchase a house for his household within the Jamaica neighborhood of Queens, New York. He requested his daughter (then a couple of years out of college) to assist by permitting him so as to add her title to the mortgage software.

Mr. James crammed out the mortgage materials (whereby he described their relationship as being “spouses”) and bought the house with out his daughter’s involvement.

But, in a predictable sample right here, Director Pulte cites a mistaken Could 20, 1983 doc Mr. James crammed out to forged his baseless allegation whereas once more ignoringthe opposite supporting documentation, one on the identical precise date that accurately describes Ms. James as being his daughter. The precise Could 20, 1983 property deed for the Jamaica, Queens residence lists Robert James “and Letitia James, his daughter.”

Learn the total letter beneath: